The Religion Clause Blog has this news on the Grace Church case I worked on. And here's another piece on it. As a student working with Claremont's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence at Chapman Law School, I explained to the San Diego Planning Commission what RLUIPA (the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act) was, and why denying Grace Church a use permit because "we have enough churches" was an impermissible burden on religious exercise. Local politicians generally don't like being told they can't do whatever they want.
Church Victory Against Hostile Local Political Activists
|
Facebook |
Digg It |
Technorati |
Del.icio.us |
Stumble It |
Posted by Tim Kowal at Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Labels: Constitutional Law , Religion
Comments for this post
All comments