A very good post on the "Secular Right" by Daniel Larison. It's not that I have any aversion to big tents -- I just don't see how it makes sense to be a part of a movement that is, at the very least, deistic in its philosophy, while disavowing all religion as either unnecessary or outright evil. Any movement seeking to instill virtue in a society must take morality seriously. Whether a philosophically cogent moral code can be constructed in a wholly secular paradigm is arguable, but I have not seen such an attempt made by the so-called secular right. The best I have seen is something like a "respect for tradition," which really boils down to nothing more than unqualified opinion. And there's already a political movement that has the market cornered in that regard.
The test is not whether one comes to the same conclusions. Conclusions are intolerably boring. It is the means employed to arrive at a conclusion that defines an ideology. I just don't see where secularists and religionists have a whole lot of meaningful ideological common ground, no matter how often they might find themselves saying "me too" on individual issues.
More Take-Down on So-Called Secular Conservativism
|
Facebook |
Digg It |
Technorati |
Del.icio.us |
Stumble It |
Posted by Tim Kowal at Thursday, December 04, 2008
Labels: Political Theory , Politics , Religion
Comments for this post
All comments